Tag Archives: chicago gun case

Online discussion of 14th Amendment and Chicago

Online video here at 7 PM Pacific, 10 PM Eastern, tonight. Speaking will be Steve Halbrook (who was bringing out books on the 14th Amendment and the right to arms 20+ years before Chicago, and got I think six citations in that opinion) and Don Kilmer, attorney in the Nordyke case, where the 9th Circuit panel ruled in favor of incorporation before Chicago came down.

Full Story

Richmond Times-Dispatch covers the Thomas concurrence

It’s not often one sees a newspaper article that reproduces large portions of a Supreme Court opinion . It’s a far cut above the usual “the decision will have these policy effects,” or “these people cheered it and those people don’t like it.” To actually report a decision, and edit it down to suitable size, requires too much work.

Full Story

A commentary on McDonald v. Chicago

Right here . “I purchased a gun several years ago, when I became concerned for the safety of my young family after receiving a verbal racial assault in our 21st century Northern California neighborhood. Perhaps I am the only Stanford Law professor who owns guns, including the one that once graced my father’s lap on that porch forty years ago

Full Story

This settles one thing

I have long felt that Second Amendment legal thinking is guided, not by any “liberal vs.

Full Story

The Empire Strikes Back

Mayor Daley proposes to replace the handgun ban with onerous regulation . Well, that’s one reason for the attorneys’ fees provisions of 42 U.S.C. §1988.

Full Story

Bob Cottrol on McDonald

at SCOTUSBlog .

Full Story

Funny read, from the Chi Tribune

It asks what gun laws Chicago should adopt if its ban is stricken .

Full Story

More reading of tea leaves

As I noted during the last such exercise, the Supreme Court considers each two-week session of oral arguments a “sitting,” and the custom is that each Justice (if at all possible) gets to write at least one opinion from each sitting. McDonald was heard during the sitting of February 22. That sitting had 13 cases, one of which was dismissed after it settled.

Full Story

Self defender downs cop-killer

This posting points to a memorable 1999 event which doesn’t seem to have attracted much media interest (it happened in Phoenix, and don’t remember hearing of it before this).

Full Story

Reading tea leaves….

The Supreme Court divides up arguments into “sittings,” each of them two weeks long. McDonald v. Chicago was argued during the sitting of Feb 22

Full Story